Blog - TheMasum.in

Sean Hall Sean Hall

0 Course Enrolled • 0 Course Completed

Biography

Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate New Cram Materials & Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Study Materials

The existence of our Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate learning guide is regarded as in favor of your efficiency of passing the Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam. At the same time, our company is becoming increasingly obvious degree of helping the exam candidates with passing rate up to 98 to 100 percent. All our behaviors are aiming squarely at improving your chance of success. We are trying to developing our quality of the Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Questions all the time and perfecting every detail of our service on the Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate training engine.

Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Syllabus Topics:

Topic
Details

Topic 1

Application Development: In this topic, Generative AI Engineers learn about tools needed to extract data, Langchain
similar tools, and assessing responses to identify common issues. Moreover, the topic includes questions about adjusting an LLM's response, LLM guardrails, and the best LLM based on the attributes of the application.

Topic 2

Evaluation and Monitoring: This topic is all about selecting an LLM choice and key metrics. Moreover, Generative AI Engineers learn about evaluating model performance. Lastly, the topic includes sub-topics about inference logging and usage of Databricks features.

Topic 3

Governance: Generative AI Engineers who take the exam get knowledge about masking techniques, guardrail techniques, and legal
licensing requirements in this topic.

>> Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate New Cram Materials <<

Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Study Materials & Online Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Tests

Our company has authoritative experts and experienced team in related industry. To give the customer the best service, all of our company's Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate learning materials are designed by experienced experts from various field, so our Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Learning materials will help to better absorb the test sites. One of the great advantages of buying our product is that can help you master the core knowledge in the shortest time. At the same time, our Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate learning materials discard the most traditional rote memorization methods and impart the key points of the qualifying exam in a way that best suits the user's learning interests, this is the highest level of experience that our most authoritative think tank brings to our Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Learning Materials users. Believe that there is such a powerful expert help, our users will be able to successfully pass the qualification test to obtain the qualification certificate.

Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate Sample Questions (Q49-Q54):

NEW QUESTION # 49
A small and cost-conscious startup in the cancer research field wants to build a RAG application using Foundation Model APIs.
Which strategy would allow the startup to build a good-quality RAG application while being cost-conscious and able to cater to customer needs?

A. Pick a smaller LLM that is domain-specific
B. Limit the number of queries a customer can send per day
C. Limit the number of relevant documents available for the RAG application to retrieve from
D. Use the largest LLM possible because that gives the best performance for any general queries

Answer: A

Explanation:
For a small, cost-conscious startup in the cancer research field, choosing a domain-specific and smaller LLM is the most effective strategy. Here's whyBis the best choice:
* Domain-specific performance: A smaller LLM that has been fine-tuned for the domain of cancer research will outperform a general-purpose LLM for specialized queries. This ensures high-quality responses without needing to rely on a large, expensive LLM.
* Cost-efficiency: Smaller models are cheaper to run, both in terms of compute resources and API usage costs. A domain-specific smaller LLM can deliver good quality responses without the need for the extensive computational power required by larger models.
* Focused knowledge: In a specialized field like cancer research, having an LLM tailored to the subject matter provides better relevance and accuracy for queries, while keeping costs low.Large, general- purpose LLMs may provide irrelevant information, leading to inefficiency and higher costs.
This approach allows the startup to balance quality, cost, and customer satisfaction effectively, making it the most suitable strategy.

NEW QUESTION # 50
A Generative Al Engineer is building a system which will answer questions on latest stock news articles.
Which will NOT help with ensuring the outputs are relevant to financial news?

A. Implement a comprehensive guardrail framework that includes policies for content filters tailored to the finance sector.
B. Incorporate manual reviews to correct any problematic outputs prior to sending to the users
C. Increase the compute to improve processing speed of questions to allow greater relevancy analysis C Implement a profanity filter to screen out offensive language

Answer: C

Explanation:
In the context of ensuring that outputs are relevant to financial news, increasing compute power (option B) does not directly improve therelevanceof the LLM-generated outputs. Here's why:
* Compute Power and Relevancy:Increasing compute power can help the model process inputs faster, but it does not inherentlyimprove therelevanceof the answers. Relevancy depends on the data sources, the retrieval method, and the filtering mechanisms in place, not on how quickly the model processes the query.
* What Actually Helps with Relevance:Other methods, like content filtering, guardrails, or manual review, can directly impact the relevance of the model's responses by ensuring the model focuses on pertinent financial content. These methods help tailor the LLM's responses to the financial domain and avoid irrelevant or harmful outputs.
* Why Other Options Are More Relevant:
* A (Comprehensive Guardrail Framework): This will ensure that the model avoids generating content that is irrelevant or inappropriate in the finance sector.
* C (Profanity Filter): While not directly related to financial relevancy, ensuring the output is clean and professional is still important in maintaining the quality of responses.
* D (Manual Review): Incorporating human oversight to catch and correct issues with the LLM's output ensures the final answers are aligned with financial content expectations.
Thus, increasing compute power does not help with ensuring the outputs are more relevant to financial news, making option B the correct answer.

NEW QUESTION # 51
A Generative Al Engineer wants their (inetuned LLMs in their prod Databncks workspace available for testing in their dev workspace as well. All of their workspaces are Unity Catalog enabled and they are currently logging their models into the Model Registry in MLflow.
What is the most cost-effective and secure option for the Generative Al Engineer to accomplish their gAi?

A. Setup a script to export the model from prod and import it to dev.
B. Setup a duplicate training pipeline in dev, so that an identical model is available in dev.
C. Use an external model registry which can be accessed from all workspaces
D. Use MLflow to log the model directly into Unity Catalog, and enable READ access in the dev workspace to the model.

Answer: D

Explanation:
The goal is to make fine-tuned LLMs from a production (prod) Databricks workspace available for testing in a development (dev) workspace, leveraging Unity Catalog and MLflow, while ensuring cost-effectiveness and security. Let's analyze the options.
* Option A: Use an external model registry which can be accessed from all workspaces
* An external registry adds cost (e.g., hosting fees) and complexity (e.g., integration, security configurations) outside Databricks' native ecosystem, reducing security compared to Unity Catalog's governance.
* Databricks Reference:"Unity Catalog provides a centralized, secure model registry within Databricks"("Unity Catalog Documentation," 2023).
* Option B: Setup a script to export the model from prod and import it to dev
* Export/import scripts require manual effort, storage for model artifacts, and repeated execution, increasing operational cost and risk (e.g., version mismatches, unsecured transfers). It's less efficient than a native solution.
* Databricks Reference: Manual processes are discouraged when Unity Catalog offers built-in sharing:"Avoid redundant workflows with Unity Catalog's cross-workspace access"("MLflow with Unity Catalog").
* Option C: Setup a duplicate training pipeline in dev, so that an identical model is available in dev
* Duplicating the training pipeline doubles compute and storage costs, as it retrains the model from scratch. It's neither cost-effective nor necessary when the prod model can be reused securely.
* Databricks Reference:"Re-running training is resource-intensive; leverage existing models where possible"("Generative AI Engineer Guide").
* Option D: Use MLflow to log the model directly into Unity Catalog, and enable READ access in the dev workspace to the model
* Unity Catalog, integrated with MLflow, allows models logged in prod to be centrally managed and accessed across workspaces with fine-grained permissions (e.g., READ for dev). This is cost- effective (no extra infrastructure or retraining) and secure (governed by Databricks' access controls).
* Databricks Reference:"Log models to Unity Catalog via MLflow, then grant access to other workspaces securely"("MLflow Model Registry with Unity Catalog," 2023).
Conclusion: Option D leverages Databricks' native tools (MLflow and Unity Catalog) for a seamless, cost- effective, and secure solution, avoiding external systems, manual scripts, or redundant training.

NEW QUESTION # 52
A Generative Al Engineer is tasked with developing an application that is based on an open source large language model (LLM). They need a foundation LLM with a large context window.
Which model fits this need?

A. DistilBERT
B. Llama2-70B
C. MPT-30B
D. DBRX

Answer: B

Explanation:
* Problem Context: The engineer needs an open-source LLM with a large context window to develop an application.
* Explanation of Options:
* Option A: DistilBERT: While an efficient and smaller version of BERT, DistilBERT does not provide a particularly large context window.
* Option B: MPT-30B: This model, while large, is not specified as being particularly notable for its context window capabilities.
* Option C: Llama2-70B: Known for its large model size and extensive capabilities, including a large context window. It is also available as an open-source model, making it ideal for applications requiring extensive contextual understanding.
* Option D: DBRX: This is not a recognized standard model in the context of large language models with extensive context windows.
Thus,Option C(Llama2-70B) is the best fit as it meets the criteria of having a large context window and being available for open-source use, suitable for developing robust language understanding applications.

NEW QUESTION # 53
A Generative AI Engineer is building a Generative AI system that suggests the best matched employee team member to newly scoped projects. The team member is selected from a very large team. Thematch should be based upon project date availability and how well their employee profile matches the project scope. Both the employee profile and project scope are unstructured text.
How should the Generative Al Engineer architect their system?

A. Create a tool for finding available team members given project dates. Embed team profiles into a vector store and use the project scope and filtering to perform retrieval to find the available best matched team members.
B. Create a tool to find available team members given project dates. Create a second tool that can calculate a similarity score for a combination of team member profile and the project scope. Iterate through the team members and rank by best score to select a team member.
C. Create a tool for finding available team members given project dates. Embed all project scopes into a vector store, perform a retrieval using team member profiles to find the best team member.
D. Create a tool for finding team member availability given project dates, and another tool that uses an LLM to extract keywords from project scopes. Iterate through available team members' profiles and perform keyword matching to find the best available team member.

Answer: A

NEW QUESTION # 54
......

The world is changing rapidly and the requirements to the employees are higher than ever before. If you want to find an ideal job and earn a high income you must boost good working abilities and profound major knowledge. Passing Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate certification can help you realize your dreams. If you buy our product, we will provide you with the best Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Study Materials and it can help you obtain Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate certification. Our product is of high quality and our service is perfect.

Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Study Materials: https://www.validdumps.top/Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate-exam-torrent.html

Sean Hall Sean Hall

Biography

Recent Blogs

Importent

Pro Services

Pages